| ||||||||
|
|
Understanding and
Budgeting When your executive management is attempting to implement very successful and productive scientific method of management such as Six Sigma, The Deming Method, TQM, or any of the Lean methods... Or you are implementing an enterprise system such as SAP, Ross, etc. are you hearing any of these phrases?
My research and discoveries concerning the budgeting and management of dynamic and nonlinear systems will prove there is a real and valid reason for certain departments to resist a scientific method of management. If you are an executive or manager responsible for implementing a scientific method of management into your organizational process but are encountering difficulties in certain areas then this seminar is for you. This seminar addresses the point in a process where the scientific method of management seems to lose effectiveness. I call this point the Linear/Nonlinear Boundary and it is where management encounters difficulty pressing a scientific method to the end of the process. At this boundary upper management begins to hear phrases listed above. These phrases are dead giveaways that a process has become nonlinear, not measurable, and impossible to predict future performance. These workers and managers on the nonlinear process resist because they know the scientific method will not work in their application.
It is not because the scientific methods are flawed, it is simply because there is always a point where any process will cease to be linear, become nonlinear, and therefore unpredictable. All scientific methods to control linear processes such as refineries, high-speed manufacturing, banking, etc. depend on some combination of a few steps such as Define, MEASURE, Analyze, and Improve to Control. These methods work so well in their linear applications that management has good reason to believe that the scientific solution could be pushed to the end of the process if they have more and more, and better and better data points measuring the process.
By applying Dr. Lorenz's research with nonlinear systems, I show that once a business process becomes nonlinear it becomes impossible to accurately measure the problem and therefore impossible to control the process. However, just because a process cannot be controlled does not mean that it cannot be managed to a significantly lower cost. Just because the manager of a nonlinear system cannot predict what their operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses will be for the next year:
This seminar offers information that will allow upper management to recognize the Linear/Nonlinear Boundary in their process and offer a better tool to budget and manage operations, maintenance, and safety in this arena. I have discovered a quick test to identify the Linear/Nonlinear Boundary:
I offer an alternate method to manage that which is not measurable and cannot be controlled. It is simple and elegant and does not require a change in organizational structure or accounting systems. The only thing you have to change is your mind concerning managing nonlinear systems.
I
am a Consultant, not an Insultant.
This seminar is targeted to the CEO, CFO, COO, General Manager, Management and the Process Managers by offering a better understanding of the root-causes and cost-drivers of operations and maintenance spending and apply this knowledge to better the management, budgeting, and support of the end user and customer. The entire focus is to allow the organization's leadership to reallocate needed resources at the proper time to create the lowest O & M cost per unit of production possible. We explain and prove:
This solution puts the executive into the leadership loop and lets them apply their management experience to the nonlinear challenges associated with operating their factories, refineries, facilities, equipment, and vehicles. Please see the Client List below to see the many organizations that have invested in this new management philosophy. Seminar Content
|
|